Search for: "HEALTHCARE EMPLOYEES V NLRB" Results 1 - 20 of 143
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2012, 8:32 am by Kara M. Maciel
  The NLRB’s 3-1 split decision in Specialty Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center of Mobile, overturned a 1991 decision and held that an employer that challenges a proposed bargaining unit on the basis that it improperly excludes certain employees is required to prove that the excluded workers share “an overwhelming community of interest” with those in the proposed unit. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 10:24 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Specialty Healthcare and Rehabilitation of Mobile, Board Case No. 15-CA-68248 (reported at 357 NLRB No. 174) (6th Cir. decided August 15, 2013 under the name Kindred Nursing Centers East, LLC f/k/a Specialty Healthcare and Rehabilitation of Mobile v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 8:32 am
Charges filed by Service Employees, United Healthcare Workers-West; complaint alleged violations of Section 8(a)(1) and (5). [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 2:54 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
See e.g., Specialty Healthcare and Rehabilitation of Mobile, Board Case No. 15-CA-68248 (reported at 357 NLRB No. 174) (6th Cir. decided August 15, 2013 under the name Kindred Nursing Centers East, LLC f/k/a Specialty Healthcare and Rehabilitation of Mobile v. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
On Sept. 29, 2006, the Board issued its decisions in Oakwood Healthcare, Croft Metals, and Golden Crest, in light of the Supreme Court's decision in NLRB v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 5:17 pm by Joy Waltemath
Judge Jordan filed a separate opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, in which he argued that FedEx had waived its challenge to the Specialty Healthcare standard (NLRB v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 2:54 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
See e.g., Specialty Healthcare and Rehabilitation of Mobile, Board Case No. 15-CA-68248 (reported at 357 NLRB No. 174) (6th Cir. decided August 15, 2013 under the name Kindred Nursing Centers East, LLC f/k/a Specialty Healthcare and Rehabilitation of Mobile v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 5:35 am
"The Court showed considerable deference to the NLRB, which applied its 2011 micro-unit holding in Specialty Healthcare. [read post]
3 Oct 2006, 3:06 pm
            In NLRB v. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 1:10 pm
The judge found that the Respondent was a "perfectly clear" successor within the meaning of NLRB v. [read post]